Hil's GQ flap
What do you think? Does this hurt Hillary Clinton's chances? As marketers and PR types, how do you spin it?
« R.I.P. TimesSelect (2005-2007); Journal next? | Home
|
Now that's innovative thinking »
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.marketingpower2.com/mt2/mt-tb.cgi/295
Recent Posts
- 'Marketing Doctor' John Tantillo's Winner and Loser of the Week: CareerBuilder and Starbucks
- 'Marketing Doctor' John Tantillo's Winner and Loser of the Week: Children's Healthcare of Atlanta and Kodak
- 'Marketing Doctor' John Tantillo's Winner and Loser of the Week: Amazon Kindle Fire and the New York Times
- 'Marketing Doctor' John Tantillo's Winner and Loser of the Week: General Motors and (Re) Brand USA
- 'Marketing Doctor' John Tantillo's Winner and Loser of the Week: Dr. Pepper Ten and Oprah
- Google's Display of Class and Humanity
- 'Marketing Doctor' John Tantillo's Winners and Loser of the Week: Google and Zagats and the 92nd Street Y
- 'Marketing Doctor' John Tantillo's Winner and Loser of the Week: Steve Jobs and Generic Tablets
- 'Marketing Doctor' John Tantillo's Winner and Loser of the Week: News Corp. and McDonald's
- 'Marketing Doctor' John Tantillo's Winner and Loser of the Week: Amy Winehouse and Arnold Schwarzenegger
Comments
No, it won't hurt Hillary's chances. The American public puts journalists in the same bed with politicians. It's a choice between the lesser of two evils.
My advice to Hil is to not say anything. GQ is doing its own spin and it's in her favor. GQ doesn't want to appear to be Clintonian political lackeys, or worse, more concerned about the corporate bottom line than news journalism. Based on the quotes from GQ I read in the linked article, they are continuing to perform well for the Clinton campaign.
Posted by: Tom McCool | October 2, 2007 9:45 AM