Community

Community

« January 2009 |  Home  | March 2009 »

February 26, 2009

Roar of the Tiger

The return of Tiger Woods is a big deal in the golf world - and perhaps an even bigger deal in the sports marketing world.

Gatorade's got a new "Welcome Back Tiger" print ad in Sports Illustrated, and a Tiger Woods' themed sports drink in the works. NBC, which is broadcasting the final rounds of the WGC-Accenture Match Play Championship this weekend, Woods' first tournament since a knee injury in June, aired Woods-centered commericals just a few hours after he announced his return, according to The Wall Street Journal.

But perhaps the most winning Tiger Woods Is Back promo spot, from an entertainment standpoint, is a new Nike commercial that barely features him at all. The ad showcases the champagne-popping, photo shoot-posing, tournament-winning sweet life for golfers Stewart Cink, Trevor Immelman, Anthony Kim, and Justin Leonard during the months without Woods. The commercial's ending isn't so happy for them, but it is pretty funny. It turns out all five athletes have Nike endorsements, and the commercial's satiric tone and star power make it memorable.

But of course, while Nike may be promoting Woods', Woods' has certainly done his fair share of promoting Nike, and Gatorade, Tag Hauer, Accenture and other brands. The Journal piece predicts Woods will become the first billion-dollar athlete in about two years, and cites Nielsen data indicating that viewership of network-broadcasted golf tournaments without Woods' dropped 47%. And Woods' influence may matter more now than last year, with North American spending in sports, arts, cause and entertainment marketing rising 2.2% this year, the weakest growth rate in 24 years.

You can read more in the Journal article, provided you're a subscriber, by clicking here. USA Today also has details about the Nike ad, which is posted below.

February 20, 2009

Marketing Writer Cameos In Music Video

I've watched more indie rock music videos - my marketing message of choice - than I can remember. But seeing myself in a music video was a first for me.

My friend Drew stumbled upon a music video for the twenty-piece rock outfit The Polyphonic Spree the other day, just because he wanted to see their acclaimed live performance of the Nirvana song "Lithium." Boy was he shocked when he saw none other than yours truly, head-bobbing and dancing amidst the masses.

I was shocked too by my cameo. The video was filmed at a Spree show I caught in Dallas in 2007. There were video cameras all over, but I never knew what became of the footage. Now I see its up on YouTube, and its been spreading out among friends, family, co-workers, and now blog readers, reaching folks who wouldn't have sought out the marketing material otherwise.

I'm a bit biased, but its a pretty sweet video, perfectly capturing the energy from the band's live show. But from a marketing output standpoint, honestly, the Spree should be doing better. This video's gotten less than 3000 views since December, and its nowhere to be found on the band's own web page or on MySpace. Ditto any footage of the new title sequence for the heavily-hyped Showtime series The United States of Tara, for which the Spree did the song. You guys may rock, but you shouldn't let these opportunities for self-promotion pass you by.

Enjoy the vid below. You can see me briefly at the 2:10 and 2:14 mark. I'm the guy in the blue shirt standing next to the gent that's got his arm up in the air.

February 19, 2009

Saturn Coulda Been a Contender

All the planned cuts announced by General Motors recently are sad for a number of reasons, but from a marketing perspective the saddest is the planned death of the Saturn brand.

Saturn was a brand that GM could have done right, and could have used to change its image back in the 1990s when there was still time to do so.

Saturn started life as a brand that attracted people who didn’t like haggling over their car purchases (who does). It was the friendly car company that hosted annual picnics at its factory for its buyers.

The first generation of Saturn buyers loved Saturn; by 1993, only two years after its first model, it was making a profit.

But rather than build on that early success, GM let the brand become a victim of corporate politics and in-fighting. As the automaker’s resources shrank, other brands fought for money and new models and Saturn, the new kid on the troubled GM block, lost out. It’s dealers became desperate for a wider lineup of cars and SUVs so they could get loyal Saturn buyers to buy Saturn again as they traded up, but they had nothing to offer.

When auto industry legend Bob Lutz joined GM in 2001, he finally got the Saturn line extended but by then it was too late, the brand had lost what cache it had.

How different would GM’s fate have been if it had backed Saturn more than a decade ago and killed Oldsmobile and Buick (why is it still keeping Buick, by the way) then?

The marketing lesson is clear, if you have a new product that connects with consumers, move heaven and earth to get the resources to keep it growing. That could mean fighting entrenched interests at other product or brands within your company. Do it. In the long run, a smart company will thank you. A dumb one will end up in the pickle GM faces today.

February 16, 2009

Do You Believe "Trust Me"?

Ad men seem to be the new lawyers/cops/doctors in terms of TV protagonists. The new TNT series Trust Me follows critical darling Mad Men in depicting the inner workings of an advertising agency. But as a seasoned marketer, do you buy into the new show's authenticity?

I can't really say for sure, having never worked in an advertising agency.

But being a writer who covers marketing, Trust Me seems to be shallow in terms of its reflection of the real advertising world. There are references to Clios, depictions of focus groups, talk of tag lines, and scenes where ad men incredibly sell half-cooked concepts to hardened clients. The latter also frequently happens on Mad Men, sometimes in the form of grandiose, borderline pretentious monologues. But the 1960s-set Mad Men uses the world of advertising to intelligently comment on a changing culture. Trust Me is primarily content to showcase neurotic/quirky banter and behavior.

It's a bit of a disappointment, considering Trust Me, centered around a pair of Chicago ad men, has been created by a pair of former Chicago ad men, Hunt Baldwin and John Coveny. They may want their audience to trust them, but I'm not so sure that Baldwin and Coveny trust their audience. Thus far in Trust Me, there has been no reference to DVRs, no discussion of YouTube or Facebook, no mention of the evolving consumer mindset or debate over the breakdown of push marketing mentality. Advertising has been impacted and challenged by these breakthroughs for years, certainly before this show went into production. It wouldn't be right to chastise Trust Me for being dated just because it was written and shot before the recession, but it's obvious that the show's writing was dated from the beginning. Even the show's own method of advertising via product placements (a growing trend in the TiVo era) is more cutting edge than what's depicted in the on-screen scenarios. The creators talked a little bit about this in an interesting Forbes interview.

My sense is that there's a concern by the producers, the writers, and/or the network that what's been happening in the real advertising world is too nuanced, too inside-baseball, for a general audience to digest in hour-long TV episodes. Maybe there's a worry too that advertisers would be scared away from a show that too realistically depicts the trials and controversies of advertising.

But I argue that these challenging times make advertising an incredibly fascinating industry to study right now. It inherently makes for good human drama, and should make for great TV entertainment. In turn, honestly addressing these obstacles can make people better appreciate and understand the art of advertising, and the show could gain more viewers, or at least coveted critical acclaim, as well.

Again, I'm a writer who covers marketing. What do you readers out there who make a living doing marketing and advertising think of Trust Me, or for that matter, Mad Men? Do you think shows about advertising can change viewers' perception of advertising for the better? And why do you think that advertising has become a focal point for not one but two TV shows in the last few years? Please post your thoughts.

If you haven't seen Trust Me, tonight's your chance - the show airs every Monday night on TNT at 10 pm ET/9 pm CT. You can also see a sneak peek of tonight's episode below, and glance at Trust Me review headlines over at Metacritic.

February 12, 2009

Happy Birthday Abe, from Mad Ave.

To celebrate Abraham Lincoln’s 200th birthday today, I found one of my favorite comedy routines from Bob Newhart, recorded in 1960. It’s a phone call (just go with it, it's comedy) between Honest Abe and his press agent (Newhart), on the eve of the Gettysburg Address. Enjoy!

February 6, 2009

For Your Safety, For Our Brand

Underwriters Laboratories, based in Northbrook, Ill., tests products like lamps, hairdryers and industrial equipment. If its safe, the manufacturer is permitted to brand the tested product with the UL certification mark. Trouble is, fewer and fewer people are concerned with that seal, and they may not even know about it.

So how does this B-to-B try to ensure relevance and solid business? By skipping on over to point C - the consumer.

Underwriter Laboratories has just wrapped up a fascinating publicity blitz that incorporated The Rockefeller Center Christmas Tree Lighting, a presence in People, The Ellen DeGeneres Show and more. Suzanne Lavin, UL's Global Corporate Communications and Public Relations Director, did a stand-up job showcasing the recent marketing strategy at a luncheon Thursday for the Chicago chapter of the Business Marketing Association - while fighting the flu, no less.

Lavin explained that even though UL tests close to 20,000 different products, components, materials and safety systems, and even though it has been around for more than 100 years, the recognition of the UL brand has been deterioriating. So to rejuvenate awareness and purpose, UL took a look at the types of everyday customers familiar with the UL brand, and those who weren't familiar with it.

The not-for-profit organization decided that awareness was lacking in a demographic it knew could be capitalized - young mothers.

New mothers are deeply concerned about safety in their homes and safety for their families, Lavin argued. And as a demographic, they are well connected, making billions of person-to-person contacts each year.

So just as Christmas was approaching, UL went out on a major media spree to educate mothers about safety, while also educating them about the UL brand.

UL sponsored the Rockefeller Center Christmas Tree Lighting and television special. It also sponsored a tree-lighting ceremony in D.C., complete with an adjoining Santa's Workshop meet and greet area. As kids and their moms waited to meet St. Nick, mothers received UL magnets and general safety tips.

UL took out ads in magazines like People and American Baby that depicted young mothers with their babies, complete with a written message about safety and UL's role in consumer protection.

UL also sought out a celebrity spokeswoman for some print and TV PSAs who herself was a young mother. They opted for actress Keri Russell, who not coincidentally, was making national television show appearances during the Christmas season promoting her new movie Bedtime Stories. So while Russell was on shows like The View and Ellen talking about her movie, she also talked about UL and shared safety tips. Ellen herself shared some special Christmas-time safety pointers on her show, and, as a joke, plugged in a light that was not UL-tested. Click here to watch the clip.

UL also created a special site, safetyathome.com, that features marketing materials, safety tips, and a blog written by the women behind rookiemoms.com. These elements and others, from conception to execution, were completed in six months, Lavin said.

Lavin teased that they aren't done with consumer-targeted marketing, but the next crucial step will be trying to package the outreach results when dealing with business stakeholders. She admits that there are no formal measurements yet, but feedback will hopefully make an impact, in the short term, but perhaps more likely, the long term.

"Building awareness takes a long time," she said. "We may not deliver increased business in a year. The measure will be how we get the message out."

We're looking to write more about leveraging B-to-B brands in a future issue of Marketing News. Keep an eye out.

February 2, 2009

The Super Bowl Spots: What Worked, What Didn't

The Marketing News staff huddled together to talk the Big Game's commercials. All in all, plenty of fumbles, but also a few inspired plays.

Here's where we stand.

John Frank, Editorial Director:
"My favorite was Careerbuilder.com’s screaming woman, crying man. It captured perfectly how a lot of us are feeling (and how we’re reacting) in this economy. Monster.com comes in second for the same reason. I thought it was a bit too gross and less creative.

"Least favorite: Coke and Pepsi ads. They blended together for me, I miss the old days when each had staked out different brand territory. Now they’re both about being happy, and they're both a little vague."

Allison Enright, Managing Editor:
"2009’s Super Bowl ads were remarkable for what they were missing, namely ads for American cars. I saw one decidedly uncreative Dodge ad pushing its employee pricing plan, which, in my opinion, seemed like throwing away $3 million because it felt the same as every other car ad on TV lately. The expectation of the Super Bowl audience is higher for these ads and this didn’t deliver. No GM. No Ford—although the Toyota Tundra ad seemed to follow the “Built Ford Tough” model. I did, however, think the Audi ad featuring Jason Statham was cinematic good fun. The Hyundai ad touting its ‘car of the year’ status to other car company execs and their culture-perfect reactions made me smile."

Piet Levy, Staff Writer:
"Only two spots last night had me in stitches. The first - Careerbuilder, naturally. But I also thought the Denny's Toughguys spot was hilarious. Here's an ad that's as simple as can get - no visual effects, no crazy edits, no big stars - and it was far funnier and more creative than a lot of the other ads that tried way, way too hard."

"The flipside of that was the Monsters Vs. Aliens/Sobe 3-D spots. The concept did have viewers across the country with goggles in hand, ready to watch. But the 3-D gimmick was a vast disappointment, and the creativity on display (Dancing footballers? Really?) was totally one-dimensional."



So, Marketing News readers, what spots did you like? What spots did you hate?

AMA IconPowered by the American Marketing Association | Copyright © 2008 MarketingPower, Inc. The site content may not be copied, reproduced, or redistributed without prior written permission of MarketingPower, Inc. or its affiliates.