Community

Community

  « John Tantillo's Winner and Loser of the Week: Toyota and YMCA |  Home  | John Tantillo’s Winner and Loser of The Week: Ellen DeGeneres and the 9/11 mosque »

John Tantillo’s Winner and Loser of The Week: BP and Marco Rubio

Winner: BP

BP is the tentative winner this week with its bold decision to appoint an American as its new CEO.

Finally, the company seems to be taking steps that make sense. This appointment sends the clear message that BP is shaking up the management that helped get it into the Gulf mess.

But, folks, they’re only a tentative winner for two reasons: 1) the change of leadership apparently won’t happen until October and, 2) it was U.S. officials who announced the news, pipping BP to the post and even leading BP to initially deny the news.

Let’s start with #2. Rule #1 of brand crisis management response is to assert affirmative, positive and undisputed control over your response. A news leak like an oil leak reflects lack of control. So the news of the management change might be welcome, but the way that news got out serves to re-enforce the image of a company that is still at loose ends.

As for the delay in the change until October, fact is this too runs against brand crisis management. If a change needs to happen, then making it happen fast–and being seen by the public to make it happen fast— is very important. Again, BP isn’t doing this.

Still, the shake-up at the top is a big one since getting rid of the current CEO, a walking brand disaster, signals a big improvement. Now BP needs to telegraph its seriousness by taking control of the way big company news reaches the media and speeding up the transition process.

Loser: Marco Rubio

Marco Rubio is bright, promising and charismatic. He’s got the tea party behind him and is the GOP candidate in his race for U.S. Senate… Why on earth does he seem to be losing ground to Charlie Crist?

Simply put, the problem is that the tea party does not have political legs.

Bottom line, the answer to Rubio’s falling poll numbers has to do with independents, moderate Republicans and the huge swathe of people in Florida who are not extreme. Many of these people might be attracted to aspects of the tea party movement, but the closer we get to actually voting for someone, the more likely they are to see tea party affiliation as a real negative. After all, we saw the tea party in another form almost two decades ago: its name was H. Ross Perot.

Folks, the squeaky wheel of activist conservatism and American populism might be getting the grease (i.e., a lot of media attention) right now, but when election time comes the buzz and passion of a new movement will matter less than appealing to the widest group of voters possible with the most credible candidate possible.

Fact is, Crist is perceived as being reasonable; Rubio is in danger of being perceived as too doctrinaire and unpredictable because of his outsider status. And in Florida, as in the rest of America, reasonableness and predictability almost always wins over ideology.

Rubio seems to know this and has been careful to distance himself from the tea party label. Months ago, he said: “When you talk about the tea party, remember, I'm a Republican." But he also knows that it was his outside, populist status and his appeal to a vocal conservative base that has gotten him as far as he is right now. He can’t distance himself too much or he will lose their support as well and be seen to be backing away from his principles.

Rubio really is in a bind. But it’s a bind that’s shared by the Republican party.

There’s a big lesson in this for Republicans looking for a reshaping of government in their favor this November: You simply can’t rely on the tea party. The most passionate, most vocal and most media-covered portion of the electorate will not win you the office. At the end of the day, a politician’s Target Market has to include independents and moderates and these voters will go for the candidate who is likable and least extreme. Conservatism might go a lot farther in November, if it remembers the middle and doesn’t go too far right now.

And, remember, things are always easier when you keep marketing and branding in mind.


Today's Tantillo Takeaway:
American voters favor moderate political brands.

John Tantillo is an AMA member and president of the Marketing Department of America, a New York-based marketing firm.
http://blog.marketingdoctor.tv/

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.marketingpower2.com/mt2/mt-tb.cgi/656

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

AMA IconPowered by the American Marketing Association | Copyright © 2008 MarketingPower, Inc. The site content may not be copied, reproduced, or redistributed without prior written permission of MarketingPower, Inc. or its affiliates.